Berkshire Hathway's ACQUISITION CRITERIA

Source: http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2000ar/acq.html

ACQUISITION CRITERIA
     We are eager to hear from principals or their representatives about businesses that meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Large purchases (at least $50 million of before-tax earnings),
  2. Demonstrated consistent earning power (future projections are of no interest to us, nor are "turnaround" situations), 
  3. Businesses earning good returns on equity while employing little or no debt, 
  4. Management in place (we can't supply it),
  5. Simple businesses (if there's lots of technology, we won't understand it),
  6. An offering price (we don't want to waste our time or that of the seller by talking, even preliminarily, about a transaction when price is unknown).
Criteria 2,3,5 &5 can be used by retain investors when choosing their investments into secondary markets

Middle managers acts a router will not longer require in IT industry

http://boomlive.in/middle-managers-act-routers-future-wipro-ceo-kurien/

Ethiraj: Are you also being self critical of your middle management?

Kurien: I think that’s true. It’s not middle management by itself and I wouldn’t define middle management very clearly. There’s middle management that really adds to technology and I think that’s fabulous to have. We absolutely need those guys. And those are people we really treasure.

There are other people who just manage people and that’s the game that you don’t want in the future. Because, having a person who sits as a router, routing traffic from one end to the other, communicating upward and managing downwards is not a function that you require long term. That particular skill set is not going to be required any more.
source: http://alphaideas.in/2015/02/16/alice-wonderland-valuations-indian-equities/

Overvalued stocks due to Fund managers are bullish and want to maintain NAV/AUM.

Consumer stocks: HUL, Colgate, Dabur, Nestle, Marico
Pharma stocks: >30 PE
MNCs: Blue Dart>110, Kenamental>90, GSK>60, Bosch >60x
Scarce/ Unique ideas: Just Dial > 80, Info Edge > 80, Jubililant Foodwork>70, Page > 70, Eicher > 60

The P/E (trailing twelve months) of Colgate has gone up from 34x in April 2014 to currently 48x. Similarly, Nestle from 42x to 53x, HUL from 33x to 44x, Dabur from 36x to 43x, Marico from 28x to 38x, etc. This is despite sales growth being slowest in the last many quarters for some of these companies (in some cases, up to eight quarters!). Similarly the P/E of some pharma companies have gone from mid-20x in April 2014 to mid-30x currently. The two other sectors which are captured by these institutions (partly overlapping with the two mentioned above) are MNCs and scarce/unique ideas. So, any MNC with a 75% parent holding is supposed to be a delisting candidate that justifies a ‘mu-maangi kimat’ for the tenderer (Blue Dart > 115x, 3M 90x, Kennametal 90x, Glaxo Pharma 60x, Bosch 60x). Scarce concepts in the listed space also command mind-boggling valuations (Just Dial 80x, Info Edge 80x, Jubilant Foodworks 75x, Page Industries 70x, Eicher Motors 60x etc.).

8 Fascinating Reads

Disconnect 
Millions of people who use Facebook (NASDAQ: FB  don't think they use the Internet
Indonesians surveyed by Galpaya told her that they didn't use the Internet. But in focus groups, they would talk enthusiastically about how much time they spent on Facebook. Galpaya, a researcher (and now CEO) with LIRNEasia, a think tank, called Rohan Samarajiva, her boss at the time, to tell him what she had discovered. "It seemed that in their minds, the Internet did not exist; only Facebook," he concluded.
The problem
Here's a great summary of healthcare costs in America by Steven Brill:
Priorities
Most big drug companies spend more on advertising than they do on research and development
Odds of success
Ben Carlson writes about one way to beat the market: concentrated portfolios:
Portfolio manager and author Robert Hagstrom performed a study that looked at 12,000 randomly generated portfolios from a universe of 1,200 stocks. He broke the portfolio up by the number of holdings so they looked as follows:
  • 3,000 portfolios containing 250 stocks.
  • 3,000 portfolios containing 100 stocks.
  • 3,000 portfolios containing 50 stocks.
  • 3,000 portfolios containing 15 stocks.
... Now take a look at the outperformance rates by portfolio size:
  • Out of 3,000 250-stock portfolios, 63 beat the market (2% of portfolios).
  • Out of 3,000 100-stock portfolios, 337 beat the market (11% of portfolios).
  • Out of 3,000 50-stock portfolios, 549 beat the market (18% of portfolios).
  • Out of 3,000 15-stock portfolios, 808 beat the market (27% of portfolios).
Personal life 
More companies are moving from casual Fridays to no-work Fridays:
That's exactly how founder and chief executive Ryan Carson, 37, has been working since 2005. These days, on Fridays, he gets his two young sons off to school and spends the day hanging out with his wife, Gill. "It's like dating again. We go to coffee shops. We read books together. I really feel like I'm involved in my kids' lives and my wife's life," Carson said. "This schedule has been absolutely life-changing for me. I can't imagine anything more valuable."
Just the facts
Josh Brown writes a great list of facts in America. Here are a few: 
The US economy has now added more than a million net new jobs over the last three months. This was the best 90 days' worth of hiring since 1997.
More jobs were created in 2014 than during any year since 1999.
759,000 people just joined the labor force and there was no post-holiday seasonal decline – it may be that temporary workers are sticking.
Average hourly wages rose .5% in January.
The cost of living has only risen .8% over the last year while wage growth has outstripped it, rising by 2.2%.
21 of 50 states put through minimum wage hikes, including populous ones like NY, FL and NJ.
Doing it right
Ronald Read left a surprise for those who knew him:
His khaki denim jacket was held together with a safety pin and his flannel shirt was so old, someone once paid for his breakfast at Friendly's. 
"The man ahead of him had paid for him," Rowell said, "Based on what he looked like and how he dressed."
Perhaps that's why the man known for his extreme frugality and scruffy appearance decided in the years before his death that he'd do a little giving of his own.
"The estate of Robert Read made its first distributions to Brattleboro Memorial Hospital and the Brooks Library in the amounts of $4.8 million and $1.2 million," Read's attorney said in a press release.
Wisdom
Here's a great take on loss aversion from Andre Agassi, tweeted by Ben Carlson: 
Have a good weekend. 
source: Now, an MF route to e-commerce


  • Pramerica has approached Sebi to launch a scheme focused on the hot sector
  • e-commerce boom: Valuation of direct plays are expensive. It is better to play e-commerce boom through Telecom, IT and logistic sector.
  • Pramerica’s closed-end scheme, benchmarked to the and rated ‘high risk’, will allow small investors a piece of this action for as little as Rs 5,000, the minimum investment. “The objective is long-term capital appreciation by investing in equity & equity-related securities, including derivatives of a diversified set of companies benefiting from rise of e-commerce in India,” the fund house said in the scheme information document filed last week.





Business Model Canvas


Average Industry RoIC (1992-2006)

Source:

annualreport-industryroichttps://janav.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/annualreport-industryroic.jpg

How to Read an Annual Report

Business Models chart

18 business models chart:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8EC0yWIcAAMlez.png:large

Munger’s Psychology Mindmapped

source: https://janav.wordpress.com/2014/11/03/mungers-psychology-mindmapped/


Incentives

Incentives

Psychological Denial

Denial

Incentive Caused Bias

IncentiveCausedBias

Consistency and Commitment

Consistency

Pavlovian Association

Association

Reciprocation

Reciprocation

Social Proof

SocialProof

Efficient Market Theory

EfficientMarketTheory

Contrast Effects

ContrastEffect

Authority

Authority

Deprival Super-reaction Syndrome

DeprivalSuperReaction

Envy and Jealousy

Envy

Mis-gambling Compulsion

GamblingMiscomplusion

Liking

Liking

Non-Mathematical Nature of Human Brain

NonMathNature

Why?

Why

Other Biases

OtherBias

Lollapalooza Effects

Lollapalooza


[source: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/02/13/the-extraordinary-story-of-americas-most-successfu.aspx]

It comes down to two factors, both of which are paradoxical and relevant to all investors in all industries.
1. Fear, disgust, hatred, and outrage toward a business is good for shareholders.
A lot of investors (understandably) want nothing to do with tobacco companies. Some pension funds are barred from owning them. And then there's the constant threat of litigation, which has hung over the industry for decades.It adds up to millions of otherwise enterprising investors who won't touch tobacco stocks.
Low investor demand keeps tobacco-stock valuations low. Low valuations lead to high dividend yields. And high dividend yields, compounded over decades, add up to massive returns.
The more hated an investment is, the higher future returns are likely to be. The same is true vice versa. This is one of the most difficult investing concepts to come to terms with, but probably the most powerful.
2. Tobacco companies barely innovate. That keeps them sustainable.
Innovation is exciting because it promises something new. New products. New markets. A new future.
But it's expensive. And even if you're great at it -- like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) is -- you'll probably stumble one day.
The products Apple made just five years ago are utterly irrelevant today. The company has to reinvest itself every few years, continuously coming up with breakthrough products that blow us away. What are the odds it'll keep innovating consistently at the rate it has for another 20, 30, 50 years? Pretty low, I'd say. Even the best players strike out from time to time, and ruthlessly competitive markets show them no mercy. It's rare that a leader sticks around for more than a decade in industries that undergo constant change.
Companies that make the same product today they did 50 years ago are different. They don't innovate, but they don't have to. It's a boring business, but it can be beautiful for shareholders because it keeps the companies chugging along for decades, if not centuries.
The ridiculously large gains from compound interest occur at long holding periods. They key to building wealthy isn't necessarily high returns, but mediocre returns sustained for the longest period of time. You typically find that in boring companies that don't innovate, and sell the same products today that they did 50 years ago, and will likely be selling 50 years from now. Food, soap, toothpaste and, yes, cigarettes are good examples.

Pat Dorsey’s Moats Mindmapped

Pat Dorsey’s Moats Mindmapped


Source: https://janav.wordpress.com/2015/02/12/pat-dorseys-moats-mindmapped/

Commodities have returned less than cash since 1980 with more volatility than stocks

Source: http://awealthofcommonsense.com/1970s/

Commodities have returned less than cash since 1980 with more volatility than stocks

Embedded image permalink

Study successful investors, and you’ll notice a common denominator: They are masters of psychology.

Creativity and Innovation in digital age

"In digital age, innovation (creativity) happens at team level rather than at individual level." - Walter Isaacson

Rent vs Own


"If it flies, floats or fornicates, always rent it - it's cheaper in the long
run." - Felix Dennis

Warren Buffett on importance of behavior


“Good profits simply are not inconsistent with good behavior.”- Warren Buffett

Warren Buffett on predictability of earnings

"If a company’s future cannot be predicted, it cannot be valued."- Warren Buffett 
My near and dear ones might be surprised to find a post by me on HOW to GET LUCKY. Being an atheist, for long I have the denied role of luck or gave it much less importance than I should have. I don’t remember what exactly changed my opinion. But I do remember that when I read   Malcolm Gladwell excellent book Outliers: The story of success, somewhere around 2009, it had significant impact on me. That book made me to realize that the professional success which I was enjoying till then, was also due to the fact that  I was working under an analyst who was ready to give me much more independence and opportunity than available to other colleagues in my office.
“How to get lucky” helped me to understand so many concepts about luck better. As usual, I came across this book in one of the presentation of Prof. Sanjay Bakshi. The underlying message of the book is not to deny the role of luck in whatever we do. There are many ideas in the book, I am sharing few ideas, which I liked most. Unless otherwise stated,words in italics refer to extracts from the book “How to Get Lucky”. I also read another book The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports, and Investing by Michael Mauboussin. With due respect to Michael Mauboussin, I found How to get lucky much more easy to understand. Michael’s book is highly technical with lots of statistics and data.

Worst-case analysis – be prepared for catastrophe

I know this situation can go wrong. Now I’ve got to ask how it can go wrong. What is the worst possible outcome? Or if there are two or more ‘worst’ outcomes, what are they? How can it go wrongest? And if the worst does happen, what will I do to save myself?
We should factor in worst case scenario without suffering from Availability Heuristic. But as observed by  Cass R.Sunstein in this article “people badly under-react to worst case scenarios”. He identified three reasons for that 1) Unrealistic optimism 2) Whether related events come to mind 3) Motivated reasoning
[Tversky and Kahneman explained in 1973, we assess the frequency, probability, or likely causes of an event by the degree to which instances or occurrences of that event are readily “available” in memory. And, of course, if something is not available in our memory, we simply cannot assign a weight to it so we leave it out of our decision-making process, leading us to make bad judgment calls.]
Before making investment in any company, its important for anyone to make sure that even in the worst case scenario, one will not incur PERMANENT LOSS OF CAPITAL and expected return is positive. As explained here, for delisting situations, worst case scenario should be withdrawal of delisting and one SHOULD NOT ASSUME that one will be smart enough to exit before opening of reverse book building.

 Importance of Risk –Reward ratio

That [not understanding risk-reward ratio] is a recipe for poor positioning in the world of luck. It is essential to study risk-reward ratios. When a given risk is small and a potential reward large, you might as well take the risk and so position yourself to become a winner.
There are two ways to be an almost sure loser in life. One is to take goofy risks; that is, risks that are out of proportion to the rewards being sought. And the other is to take no risks at all.
All decisions involve some uncertainty……
Lucky people, as a breed, are able to live with the knowledge that some decisions will turn out wrong. This is part of their general habit of accepting risk. “You take risks going in and you take risks getting out. If you were to insist on 100% certainty, you would not be able to make any move.
Dr. Ben Carson [Yes, he is a doctor and not an equity analyst] highlighted the same point in his excellent book Take risk
All my life I’ve observed two groups of people who have made serious life-impacting mistakes in their approaches to risk. First are those people who sadly are so afraid to take any risk that they never actually manage to do anything of true significance in their lives. Second are those individuals who take all the wrong risks and tragically end up hurting or destroying themselves or others in the process. Lives are ruined either way, and both groups fail to reach their potential. They never discover or enjoy the true purpose for which God placed them on earth.
Related to risk-reward ratio and worst case analysis, I am reminded of the risk matrix suggested by Dr Ben Carson in his wonderful book Take risk.
“Whenever I face a hard decision or a risky situation in life (personally or professionally), all my thinking, all my analysis, all my planning can be boiled down to four simple questions:
1)      What is the best thing that can happen if I do this
2)      What is the worst thing that can happen if I do this?
3)      What is the best thing that can happen if I don’t do this?
4)      What is the worst thing that can happen if I don’t this?
One of the good example of risk-reward ratio was   Aeonian Investments, in which losses was capped but upside uncertain. 

Losing job  

If you lose your job because of events that are not of your making, the unhappy episode may knock you down but needn’t knock you out. It needn’t, that is, as long as you see clearly that what has happened to you is only a case of bad luck. But if you automatically assume that every bad thing that happens to you is in some way your own fault, then bad luck will almost always become worst luck.
 All this was a typically lucky reaction to adversity. The unlucky personality would seek just one way out of a hole – the obvious way: “I gotta find another job!” But Darrow’s reaction was more likely to bring success. His thinking went something like this: “It would be nice to find another job. I’ll try. But in case I don’t run into good luck along that route, I’d better look for luck in some other directions at the same time.”
Similar advice is given in the excellent book “The Gift of Job Loss”
Don’t push the ocean” is the favourite saying of a friend of mine. What she means is that when things are leaning a certain way, maybe it is for a reason. Instead of going against the tide, ride the wave. Maybe she was right. My brain started to work overtime. A mix of thoughts seemed to come to the surface, not very well aligned, uneven, nagging, and not making too much sense at first. The idea of taking some time off, of not fighting the potential job loss but embracing it with vigor, was slowly nesting in my head. Like a ray of sunlight parting the clouds, my gloom started to dissipate.
“Gift of Job Loss” is very close to my heart. I read this book immediately after I lost my job in Nov 2011 and it helped me to think rationally.

Process vs outcome

Never confuse luck with planning. If you do that, you all but guarantee that your luck, in the long run, will be bad.
Avoid learning false lessons from random events….
When outcomes are brought about by random events that are not under anybody’s control – events that we would define collectively as luck – then you must be very careful in determining what lessons may be drawn from them. The habit of deriving false lessons from life’s random happenings is a trait of the unlucky.
Process vs outcome
To read the same thing in the words of James Montier and  Michael Mauboussin readhere 

 On Importance of networking

 But he could know that his chances of getting a break improved in direct proportion to the number of people he knew. The lucky personality gets to know everybody in sight: the rich and the poor, the famous the humble, the sociable and even the friendless and the cranky. Whether you aspire to get into the movies or simply get a higher-paying or more exciting job, the rule is the same. Go where events flow fastest.
But it does not mean you have to know EVERYBODY …..
This doesn’t mean you have to be one of those Personality Kids who know everybody in town. We can’t all be the life of the party. Some of us are quieter than others. But we can all go around with a look and attitude that says we want to be friendly. We can stay active. The worst thing you can do is withdraw from the network of friendships and acquaintanceship at home and at work. If you aren’t in the network, nobody is ever going to steer anything your way.
But why is she in the right places at the right times?….
Because she has made the effort to be in many places at many times. Fate has given her a lucky break, but she has earned it. She has positioned herself for it.
Don’t speak unless you absolutely must or you may regret it later
The chronic loser buys some stock and blabs to his or her spouse, explaining all the reasons why this investment is so nifty. Bad luck obtrudes. The stock price plunges. This is the time when the speculator ought to apply the Fifth Technique, luck selection. The venture has soured, so it is time to discard bad luck before it becomes worse luck. It is time to sell out. But the loser, being a loser, has communicated too much. Now the spouse is jeering. “You sure know how to pick them! Wow, what an expert! This nifty investment has cost us 6,000 bucks so far. Boy I hope it doesn’t get any niftier!” The loser finds it impossible to say “I was wrong.” Instead, he is forced to take a stand: “This is just temporary, I tell you! Just wait. I’ll be proved right in the end!” And down the drain go the talky two. Since life is ruled by luck and you can never predict what actions you will need to take, it is best to say as little as possible about what you are doing and thinking. Then, when action is required, the only person you must argue with is yourself. That is often tough enough.
This doesn’t mean you must turn yourself into a stone statue…..
They are particularly careful when talking of subjects that have great personal importance to them. They reveal no more of their thinking than they have to. They don’t lock themselves into positions where there is no good reason to do so.
Mohnish Pabrai advises not to discuss one’s current holding widely for the same reason
If investors get in the habit of discussing their investments they may end up suffering from commitment bias. If they constantly talk about how great a company is, they may suffer from a bias that could impair their judgment.

Source: https://contrarianvalueedge.wordpress.com/2014/03/03/how-to-get-lucky/ 

Purpose as key differentiators in brand building



  • Mariwala explained how innovation is expected out of everyone as Marico’s inherent company culture. He cited the example of Parachute Oil which was initially sold in tin cans. The challenge was to offer the oil in plastic which is cheaper. “We went to the retailers but there was a huge ‘no’ from them. Because somebody had tried it before and failed.” It caused spillage and rats had bitten all over the packages. But we didn’t take no for an answer and went back to the drawing board. We actually put the product in rat cages and proved that it remained intact, he said. “It took us ten years to convert the market from tin to plastic. In that process, our market share rose from 15% to 50%,” he added. But coconut oil freezes in winter so we again innovated and made an easy jar for winters. Then there were a lot of copy cats and we were losing 20% sales to copy cats. We used technology to prevent this. So we made a pilfer-proof fliptop. Later we also came up with this Rs 1 mini bottle.
  • Marico faced a threat in the year 1998. Hindustan Lever , as part of an acquisition,  got Tata Nihar brand. Considering how Colgate was weakened by Pepsodent, there was a huge fear within Marico. Mariwala said the fear was created in them so they would sell out. But they stood their ground and refused to sell out and decided to take them on. They decided to spend more on advertising, ramp up the distribution network and have the mindset of being leaders. They released a new campaign called ‘Shuddhata ki shakti’ parachute. But their biggest challenge was to motivate the field force. They were called to a five star hotel for a conference in  a simulated war room scenario for which a special video was created which showed it was time for war and Nihar had to be vanquished.

    After the ordeal, finally Parachute lost marginal market share. Nihar got 10 to 12% market share, that too at the cost of weaker players. At some same stage they lost interest in the category and that was the time when Hindustan was getting integrated with Unilever. Mariwala was able to persuade the top leadership to buy the brand when it is auctioned. They were focused on acquiring it as it complemented them and is selling well in the east. Finally they did acquire the brand.

    He cited another example of innovation when they acquired Mediker from P&G which was initially being sold as a shampoo. But Marico converted it into oil and doubled its sales. He said innovation can be applied not just to a product but can extend to all aspects of the business process.

    Marico’s Saffola entered the breakfast category with oats, but had to differentiate themselves from Quaker and Kellogg. They employed the innovation of introducing savoury oats to Indians, masala oats. They have the largest marketshare in savoury oats category.

    He said purpose plays an important role in brand building. He cited the example of how Brand Saffola talks about taking care of the heart and is hugely recalled as a champion of healthy heart. He further spoke about Nihar Shanti Amla, a brand that is very successful in Hindi Heartland. It is a challenger brand in the amla segment where Dabur is the leader. Initially Nihar Shanti Amla gave a value-for-money challenge and they realised that although they did get marketshare, it was perceived as an economical, borderline cheap brand. So they needed to improve brand perception and decided to build a purpose. The chose children education. Their marketshare was 18% in 2012 and has gone up to 25% in the subsequent year and finally up to 30%.

    Later in a Q&A session with Sam Balsara, Chairman, Madison World, Mariwala spoke about entering into the service category with Kaya Skin Clinics, which was away from their core competency and a huge learning curve. Instead of a just giving laser hair removal solutions (which was the initial proposal), they decided to provide a full range of skin services with dermatologists and experts.

    The annual event is organised by Pitch, the marketing magazine of the exchange4media Group and powered by general entertainment channel Colors,  the presenting sponsor is Big Magic.




Source: http://www.exchange4media.com/59004_maricos-harsh-mariwala-on-innovation-purpose-as-key-differentiators-in-brand-building.html

A simple formula for investing success


  • Simple formula for investing success GRIP = Good Company + Right Price + Investment + Patience
  • Good company:
    • Moat, Growth, Capital allocation record, Company's culture, Strength of it's financials: Continuously learning about the business over the life of the investment is an essential component to investing success. Initially, your focus should be on determining whether or not the company possesses durable competitive advantages (i.e. an economic moat), what it's growth runway looks like, the skill with which management allocates shareholder capital, the company's culture, the strength of its financials, and so on.
  • Right Price:
    • Even a good company can make for a bad investment if you overpay for it, so it's important to consider valuation before making any investment.
    • Invest when upsides outweighs downside.
    • Have potential range of buy value
    • The simple the model, better.
  • Investment:
    • When you have good company available at good price, invest. Consider margin of safety when investing to protect downside when you are wrong.
    • Investing success is impossible unless money is actually put to work.
  • Patience:
    • Once you have made investment, let it compound and do not trouble until selling criteria is triggered.




Source: http://www.cleareyesinvesting.com/2015/02/a-fresh-look-at-simple-formula.html


  • The World always has issues … The best thing to do when you are investing is to focus on the micro and focus on a specific business. It is hard enough to just hone in on a particular business and try to extrapolate forward what happens to that business. It will hurt investors more than it will help investors if they overdose on macro. Most of the macro things are very hard to predict and the best thing is to just not bother about predicting them” - Mohnish Pabrai [in response to question asked by young student on Global economy given the crisis in Russia, Iran sanction etc.]
  • The world’s always uncertain. The world was uncertain on December 6th, 1941, we just didn’t know it. The world was uncertain on October 18th, 1987, you know, we just didn’t know it. The world was uncertain on September 10th, 2001, we just didn’t know it. The world – there’s always uncertainty. Now the question is, what do you do with your money? And if you – the one thing is if you leave it in your pocket, it’ll become worth less – not worthless – worth less over time. That’s certain – that’s almost certain. You can put it in bonds and then you can get a certain 2 percent for 10 years and that’s almost certain to be less than the decline and the purchasing power. You can put it in farms and the farms will probably keep growing corn and soybeans and they’ll grow it whether, you know, whether Italy has trouble tomorrow or not. It’s very interesting to me, if you own a farm and somebody said, you know, Italy’s got problems. Do you sell your farm tomorrow?” - Warren Buffett [Answers on how Warren processes Uncertainity.]
  • If you own a good business locally in Omaha and somebody says Italy’s got problems tomorrow, do you sell your business? Do you sell your apartment house? No. But for some reason, people think if they own wonderful businesses indirectly through stocks, they’ve got to make a decision every five minutes. So I do not think if Ben Bernanke comes up and whispers to me that he’s going to do X, Y or Z tomorrow, I’m not going to change my view about what businesses I want to own. I want – I’m going to own those businesses for years just like I would own a farm or an apartment house and they’ll be all kinds of events and there’ll be all kinds of uncertainties and in the end, what will really count is how that business or farm or apartment house does over the years.” - Warren Buffett
  • I don’t think about the macro stuff. What you really want to do in investments is figure out what is important and knowable. If it is unimportant or unknowable, you forget about it. What you are talking about is important but is not knowable…. We don’t want to pass up the chance to do something intelligent because of some prediction about something that we are no good at anyway” - Waren Buffett
  • That factor so overrides anything else. If you’re right about the business, you’ll make a lot of money … the timing part of it is a very tricky thing. I don’t worry about any given event if I have a wonderful business … With a wonderful business, you can figure out what will happen, you cannot figure out when it will happen. You don’t want to focus too much on “when”, you want to focus on “what”. If you’re right about “what”, you don’t have to worry about “when” very much - Warren Buffett


[Source: http://rakesh-jhunjhunwala.in/i-never-worry-about-macro-factors-when-buying-stocks-mohnish-pabrai/]